Marriage in Japan
|Part of a series on the|
Marriage in Japan is a legal and social institution at the center of the household. Couples are legally married once they have made the change in status on their family registration sheets, without the need for a ceremony. Most weddings are held either according to Shinto traditions or in chapels according to Christian marriage traditions.
Traditionally, marriages were categorized into two types according to the method of finding a partner—omiai, meaning arranged or resulting from an arranged introduction, and ren'ai, in which the husband and wife met and decided to marry on their own—although the distinction has grown less meaningful over postwar decades as Western ideas of love alter Japanese perceptions of marriage.
- 1 History
- 2 Demographic
- 3 Marriage law
- 4 Wedding ceremonies
- 5 See also
- 6 Works Cited
- 7 References
The institution of marriage in Japan has changed radically over the last millennium. Indigenous practices adapted first to Chinese Confucianism during the medieval era, and then to Western concepts of individualism, gender equality, romantic love, and the nuclear family during the modern era. Customs once exclusive to a small aristocracy gained mass popularity as the population became increasingly urbanized.
Heian period (794–1185)
The Heian period of Japanese history marked the culmination of its classical era, when the vast imperial court established itself and its culture in Heian-kyō (modern Kyoto). Heian society was organized by an elaborate system of rank, and the purpose of marriage was to produce children who would inherit the highest possible rank from the best-placed lineage. It was neither ceremonial nor necessarily permanent.
Aristocrats exchanged letters and poetry for a period of months or years before arranging to meet after dark. If a man saw the same woman for a period of three nights, they were considered married, and the wife's parents held a banquet for the couple. Most members of the lower-class engaged in a permanent marriage with one partner, and husbands arranged to bring their wives into their own household, in order to ensure the legitimacy of their offspring.
High-ranked noblemen sometimes kept multiple wives or concubines. Aristocratic wives could remain in their fathers' house, and the husband would recognize paternity with the formal presentation of a gift. The forms of Heian courtship, as well as the pitfalls of amorous intrigue, are well represented in the literature of the period, especially The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter, The Sarashina Diary, The Pillow Book, and The Tale of Genji.
Edo period (1600–1868)
In pre-modern Japan, marriage was inextricable from the ie (家, "family" or "household"), the basic unit of society with a collective continuity independent of any individual life. Members of the household were expected to subordinate all their own interests to that of the ie, with respect for an ideal of filial piety and social hierarchy that borrowed much from Confucianism. The choice to remain single was the greatest crime a man could commit, according to Baron Hozumi.
Marriages were duly arranged by the head of the household, who represented it publicly and was legally responsible for its members, and any preference by either principal in a marital arrangement was considered improper. Property was regarded to belong to the ie rather than to individuals, and inheritance was strictly agnatic primogeniture. A woman (女) married the household (家) of her husband, hence the logograms for yome (嫁, "wife") and yomeiri (嫁入り, "marriage," lit. "wife entering").
In the absence of sons, some households would adopt a male heir (養子, or yōshi) to maintain the dynasty, a practice which continues in corporate Japan. Nearly all adoptions are of adult men. Marriage was restricted to households of equal social standing (分限), which made selection a crucial, painstaking process. Although Confucian ethics encouraged people to marry outside their own group, limiting the search to a local community remained the easiest way to ensure an honorable match. Approximately one-in-five marriages in pre-modern Japan occurred between households that were already related.
Outcast communities such as the Burakumin could not marry outside of their caste, and marriage discrimination continued even after an 1871 edict abolished the caste system, well into the twentieth century. Marriage between a Japanese and non-Japanese person was not officially permitted until 14 March 1873, a date now commemorated as White Day. Marriage with a foreigner required the Japanese national to surrender his or her social standing.
The purposes of marriage in the medieval and Edo periods was to form alliances between families, to relieve the family of its female dependents, to perpetuate the family line, and, especially for the lower classes, to add new members to the family's workforce. The seventeenth-century treatise Onna Daigaku ("Greater Learning for Women") instructed wives honor their parents-in-law before their own parents, and to be "courteous, humble, and conciliatory" towards their husbands.
Husbands were also encouraged to place the needs of their parents and children before those of their wives. One British observer remarked, "If you love your wife you spoil your mother's servant." The tension between a housewife and her mother-in-law has been a keynote of Japanese drama ever since.
Romantic love (愛情, aijō) played little part in medieval marriages, as emotional attachment was considered inconsistent with filial piety. A proverb said, "Those who come together in passion stay together in tears." For men, sexual gratification was seen as separate from conjugal relations with one's wife, where the purpose was procreation. The genre called Ukiyo-e (浮世絵, lit. "floating world pictures") celebrated the luxury and hedonism of the era, typically with depictions of beautiful courtesans and geisha of the pleasure districts. Concubinage and prostitution were common, public, relatively respectable, until the social upheaval of the Meiji Restoration put an end to feudal society in Japan.
Meiji Restoration and modernization (1868–1912)
During the Meiji period, upper class and samurai customs of arranged marriage steadily replaced the unions of choice and mutual attraction that rural commoners had once enjoyed. Rapid urbanization and industrialization brought more of the population into the cities, ending the isolation of rural life. Public education became almost universal between 1872 and the early 1900s, and schools stressed the traditional concept of filial piety, first toward the nation, second toward the household, and last of all toward a person's own private interests. Marriage under the Meiji Civil Code required the permission of the head of a household (Article 750) and of the parents for men under 30 and women under 25 (Article 772).
In arranged marriages, most couples met beforehand at a formal introduction called an omiai (お見合い, lit. "looking at one another"), although some would meet for the first time at the wedding ceremony. A visitor to Japan described the omiai as "a meeting at which the lovers (if persons unknown to each other may be so styled) are allowed to see, sometimes even to speak to each other, and thus estimate each others' merits." However, their objections carried little weight. The meeting was originally a samurai custom which became widespread during the early twentieth century, when commoners began to arrange marriages for their children through a go-between (仲人 , nakōdo) or matchmaker. The word omiai is still used to distinguish arranged marriages, even when no formal meeting takes place, from ren'ai (恋愛, a "love match").
Courtship remained rare in Japan at this period. Boys and girls were separated in schools, in cinemas, and at social gatherings. Colleagues who began a romantic relationship could be dismissed, and during the Second World War traveling couples could be arrested. Parents sometimes staged an arranged marriage to legitimize a "love match," but many others resulted in separation and sometimes suicide. Love was thought to be inessential to marriage. A proposal by Baron Hozumi, who had studied abroad, that the absence of love be made a grounds for divorce failed to pass during debates on the Meiji Civil Code of 1898. One writer observed in 1930, "According to the traditional moral ideas, it is deemed a sign of mental and moral weakness to 'fall in love.'"
Marriage, like other social institutions of this period, emphasized the subordinate inferiority of women to men. Women learned that as a daughter they ought to obey their father, as a wife their husband, as a widow their sons. Chastity in marriage was expected for women, and a law not repealed until 1908 allowed a husband to kill his wife and her lover if he found them in an adulterous act. The prostitution of women survived the periodic intrusion of puritanical ideals on Japan's less restrictive sexuality.
Divorce laws become more equal over time. During the Edo period, a husband could divorce his wife by writing a letter of his intent to do so, but a wife's only recourse was to flee to a convent. The laws of the early Meiji period established several grounds on which a man could divorce: sterility, adultery, disobedience to parents-in-law, loquacity, larceny, jealousy, and disease. A wife, accompanied by a close male relative, could appeal for divorce if she had been deserted or imprisoned by her husband, or if he was profligate or mentally ill. The 1898 Civil Code established the principle of mutual consent, although the consent of women was still likely to be forced until the early twentieth century, as women gradually gained access to education and financial independence. The fight for divorce rights marked the beginning of Japanese feminism.
Post-war period (1945–present)
Signed after the surrender and occupation of Japan by Allied forces, Article 24 of the Constitution of 1947 reestablished marriage on grounds of equality and choice: "Marriage shall be based only on the mutual consent of both sexes and it shall be maintained through mutual cooperation with the equal rights of husband and wife as a base. With regard to choice of spouse, property rights, inheritance, choice of domicile, divorce and other matters pertaining to marriage and the family, all laws shall be enacted from the standpoint of individual dignity and the essential equality of the sexes."
The Constitution abolished the foundations of the ie system and the patriarchal authority at its heart. Each nuclear family retained, and still retains, a separate family registration sheet, initiated on marriage under the surname of the husband or wife, but the head of each household no longer had any special legal prerogatives over his or her dependents. All legitimate children, male or female, gained an equal right to inheritance, putting an end to primogeniture succession and the obsession with lineage. Women received the right to vote and the right to request a divorce on the basis of infidelity. The Meiji emphasis on Confucian values and national mythology disappeared from education. The conventional model of the ie was replaced with a new convention, the kazoku (家族, family) and the kakukazoku (核家族, nuclear family), as the fundamental unit of society.
New demographic trends emerged, including a later age of marriage and a smaller difference in age between groom and bride, the birth of two children in quick succession, few children born out of wedlock, and a low divorce rate. Lifetime employment became the norm for Japanese men, especially during the post-war economic boom of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. A middle class ideology established a gendered family pattern with separate social spheres: a salaried husband to provide the family income, a housewife to manage the home and nurture the children, and a commitment by the children to education. Better health and nutrition meant a rapid extension of life expectancy, and government policies have encouraged people to form sansedai kazoku (三世代家族, "three-generation families") to manage a rapidly aging society.
Omiai marriages, arranged by the parents or a matchmaker, remained the norm immediately after the war, although the decades which followed saw a steady rise in the number of ren'ai "love matches." The distinction between the two has blurred: parents almost always consulted young people before "arranging" a marriage, and many young people asked an employer or teacher to serve as matchmaker for their "love match." Today only one in 20 married couples describe their formation as arranged, and a courtship of several years has become the norm even for relationships that begin with an omiai. Three in five couples meet in the workplace or through friends or siblings.
Online dating services in Japan gained a reputation as platforms for soliciting sex, often from underage girls, for sexual harassment and assault, and for using decoy accounts (called otori or sakura in Japanese) to string along users in order to extend their subscriptions. Newer services like Pairs, with 8 million users, or Omiai have introduced ID checks, age limits, strict moderation, and use of artificial intelligence to arrange matches for serious seekers. Profiles typically include age, location, height, career, and salary, but can also include interests, hobbies, and familial interests.
The term "marriage hunting" (kekkon katsudo, or konkatsu), has become popular since 2007.:82 It reflects a professional class of matchmaking services which arrange meetings between potential partners, typically through social events, and often includes the exchange of resumes.:83
According to the 2010 census, 58.9% of Japan's adult population is married, 13.9% of women and 3.1% of men are widowed, and 5.9% of women and 3.8% of men are divorced. The annual number of marriages has dropped since the early 1970s, while divorces have shown a general upward trend.
Marriage and fertility
The decline of marriage in Japan, as fewer people marry and do so later in life, is a widely cited explanation for the plummeting birth rate. Although the total fertility rate has dropped since the 1970s (to 1.43 in 2013), birth statistics for married women have remained fairly constant (at around 2.1) and most married couples have two or more children. Economic factors, such as the cost of raising a child, work-family conflicts, and insufficient housing, are the most common reasons for young mothers (under 34) to have fewer children than desired.
The number of single-child or childless couples has increased since 2002 (to 23.3 percent in 2010) even as the desire for larger families remains the same. Only 2% of births occur outside of marriage, compared to 30-60% of births in Europe and North America. This is due to social taboos, legal pressure, and financial hurdles.
Half of Japan's single mothers live below the poverty line, among the highest for OECD countries. In addition, an estimated 3.5 million Japanese children, one in six of those below the age of 18, are from households classed as experiencing "relative poverty" by the OECD.
Almost 90% of unmarried Japanese intend to marry, and yet the percentage of people who don't continues to rise. Between 1990 and 2010, the percentage of 50-year-old people who had never married roughly quadrupled for men to 20.1% and doubled for women to 10.6%. The Welfare Ministry predicts these numbers to rise to 29% of men and 19.2% of women by 2035. The government's population institute estimated in 2014 that women in their early 20s had a one-in-four chance of never marrying, and a two-in-five chance of remaining childless.
Recent media coverage has sensationalized surveys from the Japan Family Planning Association and the Cabinet Office that show a declining interest in dating and sexual relationships among young people, especially among men. However, changes in sexuality and fertility are more likely an outcome of the decline in family formation than its cause. Since the usual purpose of dating in Japan is marriage, the reluctance to marry often translates to a reluctance to engage in more casual relationships.
The majority of Japanese people remain committed to traditional ideas of family, with a husband who provides financial support, a wife who works in the home, and two children. Labor practices, such as long working hours, health insurance, and the national pension system, are premised on a traditional breadwinner model. As a result, Japan has largely maintained a gender-based division of labor with one of the largest gender pay gaps in the developed world, even as other countries began moving towards more equal arrangements in the 1970s.
However, economic stagnation, anemic wage growth, and job insecurity have made it more and more difficult for young Japanese couples to secure the income necessary to create a conventional family, despite their desire to do so. Japan was once well known for lifetime employment, but after the asset price bubble burst and the 1997 Asian financial crisis regular employment for unmarried men age 25-34 dropped from 78% in 1982 to 55% in 2010 as companies began employing more people on temporary or part-time contracts. These non-regular employees earn about 53% less than regular ones on a comparable monthly basis, according to the Labor Ministry, and as primary earners are seven times more likely to fall below the poverty line. Men in this group are more than twice as reluctant to consider marriage, and in their 30s they are about 40% less likely to be married than those with regular employment.
According to the sociologist Masahiro Yamada, the failure of conventions to adapt to the economic and social realities of Japanese society has caused a "gap in family formation" between those who succeed in creating a conventional family and those who remain single and childless.
The average age at first marriage in Japan has climbed steadily from the middle of the 20th century to around 31 for men and 29 for women in 2013, among the highest in Asia. Women postpone marriage for a variety of reasons, including high personal and financial expectations, increasing independence afforded by education and employment, and the difficulty of balancing work and family. Masahiro Yamada coined the term parasite singles (パラサイトシングル parasaito shinguru) for unmarried adults in their late 20s and 30s who live with their parents, though it usually refers to women. Men who do not aggressively pursue marriage are known as herbivore men (草食男子 sōshoku danshi).
Of the 660,613 marriages registered in 2013, 21,488 (or about 1 in 30) were between a Japanese and a foreign national, according to the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. The number of international unions rose rapidly in the 1980s and 90s, peaked in 2006 at 44,701 (about 1 in 16), and has declined since then. Changes in the Immigration Control Act in 2005, which made it more difficult for Philippine nationals to work in Japan, are one cause of the decline. Filipino women saw the largest drop, from 12,150 in 2006 to 3,118 or 20.1% of foreign brides in 2013. Many Filipino women come to Japan as entertainers, and some have been victims of domestic violence.
The nationality of foreign spouses differs by gender, and Japanese women are more likely to marry partners from outside East and Southeast Asia than Japanese men. Of the 15,442 non-Japanese brides in 2013, most came from China (40.4%), followed by the Philippines (20.1%), South Korea (17.7%), and Thailand (6.3%). The 6,046 grooms came from Korea (27.9%), the United States (19.1%), China (11.8%), and Brazil (4.7%). Many of the Chinese and Korean (Zainichi) nationals included in these statistics have lived in Japan for generations without becoming naturalized citizens.
Of the 1 million children born in Japan in 2013, 2.2% had one or more non-Japanese parent. The rise in international households has sometimes led to conflicts over custody. Biracial Japanese children are often called hāfu (ハーフ), although the term has its discontents.
According to a summary of surveys by Japan's Gender Equality Bureau in 2006, 33.2% of wives and 17.4% of husbands have experienced either threats, physical violence, or rape, more than 10% of women repeatedly. This violence almost always occurred after marriage. Dating abuse has also been reported by 13.5% of women and 5.2% of men.
A marriage is legally recognized once a couple has successfully submitted the required documents to the city hall registrar to change their status in their koseki (戸籍) family registration sheet. No ceremony is required under Japanese law. The family registration sheet serves as birth certificate, proof of citizenship, marriage license, and death certificate. A register is kept for each nuclear family, under the name of the head of the household (筆頭者, hittousya), with the spouse and unmarried children who are registered as dependents.
A couple who marries must file a marriage registration form (婚姻届, konin todoke) to create a new registration sheet (新戸籍, shinkoseki) under a common surname. Since 1947, couples have been permitted to choose either the surname of the husband or wife, consistent with a ban on separate surnames first imposed in 1898. Married couples are estimated to choose the man's surname 95% of the time, although some women continue to use their maiden name informally. The ban has survived several legal challenges on the basis of gender inequality, most recently in 2015. When marriage is used to adopt a male heir, the husband takes his wife's family name.
International marriages are subject to separate rules within Japan. Foreigners in Japan do not have their own family registration sheet, and therefore those who marry a Japanese national are listed on his or her family's sheet. Foreign spouses in Japan are eligible for a long-term dependent visa.
Children born out of wedlock are recorded as illegitimate on their mother's family register, although they can be legitimized by a later acknowledgment of paternity. Illegitimate children were eligible for half the inheritance of legitimate ones until a court ruling in 2013.
A common description of Japan's religious syncretism says: "Born Shinto, married Christian, die Buddhist." In practice, however, elements of all three major traditions tend to be practiced side-by-side. Japanese weddings usually begin with a Shinto or Christian-style ceremony for family members and very close friends before a reception dinner and after-party at a restaurant or hotel banquet hall. There the couple's extended families and friends make speeches and offer goshūgi (ご祝儀, "gift money") in a special envelope. Close family pay about twice as much as friends.
Japanese Shinto ceremonies
Traditional Shinto ceremonies (神前式, 'shinzen shiki'), which account for around one in six of Japanese weddings, are held in the main building of a shrine. A priest performs a ritual purification for the couple, then announces their marriage to the Kami (神, "gods" or "spirits") of the shrine and asks for their blessing. The bride and groom take three sips each from three cups of sake, a ritual called sansankudo (三三九度).
Japanese brides, sometimes painted white as a sign of purity before the gods, wear a kimono which is either shiromuku (白無垢, "pure white dress"), iro uchikake (色打掛, "colorful outer robe"), or kurobiki furisode (黒引き振袖), the black and patterned kimono once worn at weddings of the nobility during the Edo period (1603–1868), with either an open white watabōshi (綿帽子) or a tsunokakushi (角隠し). Grooms wear a black crested haori (羽織) jacket and loose, skirt-like hakama (袴) with a vertical stripe.
Christian chapel ceremonies
Christian wedding ceremonies have since the mid-1990s displaced the Shinto rite and continue to remain Japan’s wedding ceremony of choice. Christian wedding ceremonies have in the last thirty years moved from the sideline to the mainstream of Japanese society. The popularity of Christian wedding ceremonies represents new widespread acceptance, commercialization, and popularity of a religious ceremony. The postwar history of Christian wedding ceremonies is best understood in light of the efforts made by traditional Christian churches and the bridal industry to meet the religious needs and demands of Japan’s largely “nonreligious” (mushūkyō) constituency.
Statistically speaking, the vast majority of contemporary Japanese self-identify as nonreligious. However, this self-identification is far from a wholesale rejection of religion, and often employed both to reject and affirm religious behaviors and identities. Most typically, nonreligious attitudes reject religious dispositions that are perceived as deviant, unhealthy, or foreign while simultaneously affirming religion’s importance.
Nonreligious individuals tend to rely on religious professionals and vicariously entrust specialized acts of prayer and ritual to religious authorities when desirable and appropriate. Along with various Buddhist and Shinto rites, Christian wedding ceremonies are now one of the occasions where nonreligious Japanese rely on religious professionals. Nonreligious attitudes are responsible for significant transformations in Japanese Christianity and the bridal industry and the successful response of the Christian churches and the bridal industry to consumer demand has led to an explosion in Christian wedding ceremonies.
The story of contemporary Japanese Christianity is one of success and failure in the face of overwhelming “nonreligiousness.” The story of failure depicts the inability of Christian churches to acquire Japanese converts; both transplant and domestic Japanese churches face aging membership and dwindling baptism numbers. In 2006, Christians accounted for 1.2 percent of the Japanese population. Similarly, Christian religious organizations accounted for a mere 2.3 percent of Japan’s 182,468 religious juridical persons. This data, along with an aging church population, led researchers to suggest that a marginal Christian population is headed for rapid decline.
However, these statistics on Christian affiliation do not account for the unprecedented popularity of Christian wedding ceremonies or address how nonreligiousness has altered Japanese Christianity. The growing popularity of Christian weddings dates back to two events in the 1980s. The first was the wedding of Lady Diana Spencer to Prince Charles, and the second—among the Japanese—was the televised wedding of the Japanese idol Momoe Yamaguchi. By the mid-1990s, Christian weddings surpassed Shinto weddings and, since 1999, continue to be the wedding ceremony of choice among sixty to seventy percent of Tokyo couples with similar trends in popularity throughout the country. Christian wedding ceremonies have attracted and sustained the interest of a majority of Japanese—the majority of whom are nonreligious. In short, the majority of Japanese are not only “Born Shinto, Die Buddhist,” but they also “Identify nonreligious, Wed Christian.”
Nonreligiousness has transformed the traditional Japanese Christian churches and the bridal industry. Although frequently dismissed as bridal-industry activity, Christian churches and personnel were essential in the rise of Christian weddings and their popularity. On 1 March 1975, the Vatican granted the Japanese Catholic Church special permission to conduct wedding ceremonies for non-affiliated, non-Christian couples. Nonreligious Japanese have access to this Catholic sacrament in a manner on par with baptized church members. These forms of access were instrumental in popularizing the Christian wedding in the late 1980s and the 1990s. The Catholic Church used in Kanda Masaki and Matsuda Seiko’s “wedding ceremony of sacred shining (seiki no kekkon)” became the setting of the 1991 Japanese television series Itsu ka, sarejio kyōkai de and one of the most popular venues in the early years of Christian weddings.
In addition to new policies and approaches, the nonreligious demand for Christian weddings has given rise to new religious institutions and powerful partnerships between commercial and religious groups—occasionally blurring the lines between the two. One successful example of religious and commercial partnership is the Christian Bridal Mission (kirisutokyō buraidaru senkyōdan), which was founded in 1980 and incorporated as a religious juridical person in 1986. From humble beginnings, this non-denominational Evangelical Protestant Church—the first Christian organization devoted exclusively to the production of weddings—grew to national proportions. Currently, the Christian Bridal Mission has over one thousand ministers—making it one of the largest Christian organizations in Japan.
Where the active majority of people are nonreligious, mechanisms for establishing a convincing reference to Christianity takes on a sensual character. Visual cues—minister’s race, architectural style, musical talent, etc.—have become the primary way not only to generate a connection to Christian tradition but to verify that a connection does exist. The bridal industry relies on sensory experience in almost every conceivable manner with the result that venues of commercial institutions now play a crucial role in the success and continued popularity of Christian weddings as new Protestant churches.
Although the Japanese have unprecedented access to the Catholic Church, the majority of weddings in Japan follow the Protestant liturgy. As such the ceremony includes elements typical to a traditional Protestant wedding including hymns, benedictions, prayers, bible readings, an exchange of rings, wedding kiss, and vows before God. It is typical for a bride to enter with her father and then be "given away" to her husband—an exchange that usually involves bowing and shaking hands. In recent years, the custom of lowering the veil has also become popular. During the veil lowering the mother of the bride lowers the veil for her daughter before she continues down the "virgin road" with her father toward her husband. In the case of a non-Japanese wedding minister, the ceremony is commonly performed in a mix of Japanese and a western language (typically, English).
Non-religious or civil ceremonies
Non-religious or civil ceremonies often take place in a banquet hall, before or during the reception party, with a Master of Ceremonies officiating and guests seated around tables. Although these ceremonies often adopt Western elements, especially a wedding dress for the bride and a tuxedo for the groom, they forego any religious connotations.
Some younger couples choose to abandon formality entirely for a "no host party" wedding, which emphasizes celebration rather than ceremony. The guests consist primarily of the couple's friends, who pay an attendance fee.
- Aging of Japan
- Confucian view of marriage
- Japanese family
- Family law in Japan
- Same-sex marriage in Japan
- Shinto wedding
- Women in Japan
- Edwards, Walter. Modern Japan Through Its Weddings: Gender, Person, and Society in Ritual Portrayal. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.
- Fukutake, Tadashi. Japanese Rural Society. Trans. by R. P. Dore. Tokyo: Oxford University Press, 1967.
- Hendry, Joy. Marriage in Changing Japan: Community & Society. Rutland, Vt, and Tokyo, 1979.
- Kawashima, Takeyoshi. Kekkon (Marriage). Tokyo: Iwanami Shinso, 1954.
- National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (IPSS). "Attitudes toward Marriage and Family among Japanese Singles." 2011.
- National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (IPSS). "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples." 2011.
- Tamura, Naoomi. The Japanese Bride. New York: Harper & Brother Publishers, 1893.
- Edwards, Modern Japan Through its Weddings.
- "Society: Marriage in Japan". Japan Reference. 4 March 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
- Kurihara, Hiromu (1999). Heian-jidai no Rikon no Kenkyu. Tokyo: Kobundo.
- Kurihara, Hiromu (1999). Heian-jidai no Rikon no Kenkyu. Tokyo: Kobundo.
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 15-6.
- Hozumi, Nobushige. Ancestor-Worship and Japanese Law. University Press of the Pacific, 2003. ISBN 1-4102-0838-9.
- Kapur, Roshni (17 January 2016). "Welcome to the family: Adult adoptions in corporate Japan". Rappler. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- Hartson, William (11 February 2016). "Top 10 facts about Japan". Express. Retrieved 17 February 2016.
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 18, 22.
- Sladen, Douglas; Lorimer, Norma (1904). More Queer Things About Japan. London: Anthony Treherne. p. 384.
- Tamura, The Japanese Bride, p. 3.
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 19-21. Fukutake, Japanese Rural Society, p. 44.
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 14, 16-7, 22-3.
- Chamberlain, Basil Hall (1902). Things Japanese (4th ed.). London: John Murray. p. 309.
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 18, 22-3.
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 24-5.
- West, Mark D. (2011). Lovesick Japan: Sex, Marriage, Romance, Law. Cornell University Press. p. 183.
- Kawashima, Kekkon, pp. 143f.
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, p. 21
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 21-2
- Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 26-8
- Kelly, William. "Finding a Place in Metropolitan Japan: Transpositions of Everyday Life." Ed. Andrew Gordon. Postwar Japan as History. University of California Press, 1993. P. 208-10.
- E-Stat (3 September 2015). "Trends in mean age of bride and groom at marriage and difference in mean age between bride and groom". Vital Statistics of Japan. Table 9-12. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
- Coleman, Samuel. "The Tempo of Family Formation." Ed. David W. Plath. Work and Lifecourse in Japan. Albany: SUNY Press, 1983. P. 183-214.
- Schirokauer, Conrad, Miranda Brown, David Lurie, and Suzanne Gay. A Brief History of Chinese and Japanese Civilizations. 4th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2013. P. 609-10.
- IPSS, "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples" (2011), table 1.1, 1.3.
- 安楽, 由紀子 (18 October 2018). "シリーズ・現代ニッポンの結婚事情：（2）婚活を効率化するマッチングサービス事情". Nippon.com. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
- Hirata, Keiko; Warschauer, Mark (2014). The Paradox of Harmony. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300186079.
- "Chapter 3: Marital Status". Populations and Households of Japan 2010 (PDF). Table 3.1. p. 33. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
- Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. "Statistical Handbook of Japan 2014". Chapter 5. Retrieved 18 January 2016.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- "Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States". CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. 13 May 2009. Retrieved 24 September 2011.
- Yamada, Masahiro (3 August 2012). "Japan's Deepening Social Divides: Last Days for the "Parasite Singles"". Nippon.com. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
- Sudo, Yoko (18 July 2014). "Japan's Low Marriage Rate Concerns Minister". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
- "Why the Japanese are having so few babies". The Economist. 23 July 2014. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, Statistics Bureau. "Japan Statistical Yearbook, Chapter 2: Population and Households". Table 2-25. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
- IPSS, "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples" (2011), pp. 9-14.
- IPSS, "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples" (2011), pp. 9-14.
- "人口動態調査（平成26年）". Retrieved 13 January 2016.
- WuDunn, Sheryl (13 March 1996). "Stigma Curtails Single Motherhood in Japan". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
- Imamura, Yuri; Imamura, Hisanori; Okabayashi, Sawa; Yamada, Kana (9 September 2014). "Half of single-mother households in Japan below poverty line, among worst in OECD rankings". The Asahi Shimbun. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
- Akaishi, Chieko (24 August 2015). "The Plight of Japan's Single Mothers". Nippon.com. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
- Brasor, Philip; Tsubuku, Masako (7 November 2015). "No relief in sight for Japan's poor single-parent families". The Japan Times. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
- McCurry, Justin. "Equality in Japan: is this vision of a fairer society too good to be true?". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
- IPSS, "Attitudes toward Marriage and Family among Japanese Singles" (2011), p. 2.
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, Statistics Bureau. "Japan Statistical Yearbook, Chapter 2: Population and Households". Table 2-12. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
- "White paper shows Japanese people delaying marriage, having children". Asahi Shimbun. 26 June 2013. Retrieved 15 January 2016.
- Yoshida, Reiji (31 December 2015). "Japan's population dilemma, in a single-occupancy nutshell". The Japan Times. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
- Haworth, Abigail (20 October 2013). "Why have young people in Japan stopped having sex?". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
- Waldman, Katy (22 October 2013). "Young People in Japan Have Given Up on Sex". Slate. Retrieved 15 January 2016.
- Osaki, Tomohiro (5 January 2016). "For many young Japanese, marriage — and sex — are low priorities". The Japan Times. Retrieved 19 February 2016.
- Matthews, Dylan (23 October 2013). "Don't worry. The Japanese are having plenty of sex". The Washington Post (Know More blog). Retrieved 15 January 2016.
- Keating, Joshua (23 October 2013). "No, Japanese People Haven't Given Up on Sex". Slate. Retrieved 15 January 2016.
- IPSS, "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples" (2011), p. 9.
- "51% want wives to stay home: poll". The Japan Times. Kyodo. 17 December 2012. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
- Yamada, Masahiro (17 March 2016). "The Future of the Japanese Family: Diversification or Virtualization?". Nippon.com. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
- Khan, Mehreen (28 March 2016). "Can anything rescue Japan from the abyss?". The Telegraph. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
- IPSS, "Attitudes toward Marriage and Family among Japanese Singles" (2011), pp. 20-21.
- Obe, Mitsuru (12 March 2015). "Japan Has Plenty of Jobs, but Workers Still Struggle". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
- Murakami, Naohisa (29 February 2016). "Regular Full-Time Positions Increasingly Elusive for Japanese Workers". Nippon.com. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
- Nohara, Yoshiaki (1 May 2017). "Japan Labor Shortage Prompts Shift to Hiring Permanent Workers". Bloomberg. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
- McCurry, Justin (25 April 2017). "Equality in Japan: is this vision of a fairer society too good to be true?". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
- OECD (2017). OECD Economic Surveys: Japan 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing. p. 47. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
- IPSS, "Attitudes toward Marriage and Family among Japanese Singles" (2011), p. 4.
- Hoenig, Henry; Obe, Mitsuru (8 April 2016). "Why Japan's Economy Is Laboring". Wall Street Journal.
- Lewis, Leo (13 January 2016). "Japan: Deflated generation". Financial Times. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
- Efron, Sonni (26 June 2001). "Me, Find a Husband? Later, Maybe". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
- "Asian demography: The flight from marriage". The Economist. 20 August 2011. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
- Kawaguchi, Akira (20 August 2015). "Japanese Women Face Tough Reality in Work and Marriage". Nippon.com. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
- Wiseman, Paul (2 June 2004). "No sex please we're Japanese". USA Today. Retrieved 10 May 2012.
- Yang, Jeff (23 March 2011). "After the end of the world". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 15 January 2012.
- "Young Japanese 'decline to fall in love'". BBC News. 11 January 2012.
- Vital Statistics in Japan: The Latest Trends (PDF). Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2013. p. 32. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- "A Look at International Marriage in Japan". Nippon.com. 19 February 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- Cartelle, Karryn (8 June 2008). "Foreign victims of domestic violence band together". Japan Today. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- "Center offers help to abused Filipinos". The Japan Times. Kyodo. 9 October 2013. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- Sugiyama, Haru (12 June 2015). "Kawasaki Youth's Murder Exposes Japan's Social and Policy Failings in Coping with Immigration". Nippon.com. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- "Trends in live births by nationality of father and mother, 1995, 2000 and 2005-2013". e-Stat. Table 9. 29 January 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Survey on Domestic Violence (Tokyo: Gender Equality Bureau, 2006) page 3, 9. (Published in Japanese only, English information available at:  or at: )
- Embassy of the United States: Japan, Marriage in Japan Archived 27 May 2010 at the Wayback Machine. Accessed 29 August 2008.
- Western Style Weddings in Japan: Are they real weddings? Seiyaku.com. Accessed 29 August 2008.
- "Japan's Family Registry System". Embassy of the United States: Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
- Soble, Jonathan (16 December 2015). "Japan's Top Court Upholds Law Requiring Spouses to Share Surname". The New York Times. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- "General visa: Dependent (family stays)". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. 22 July 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
- Tamura, Tsuyoshi (4 September 2013). "Top court rules illegitimate children entitled to equal inheritance". The Asahi Shimbun. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
- Kisala, R (2006). "Japanese Religions". In Swanson, P; Chilson, C (eds.). Nanzan Guide to Japanese Religions (3-13 ed.). University of Hawaii Press. p. 3.
- "Wedding Ceremonies in Japan". Hiragana Times (June 2010 Issue). 9 January 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
- "Weddings in Japan". Nippon.com. 20 July 2015. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
- LeFebvre, J. (2015). Christian wedding ceremonies: “Nonreligiousness” in contemporary Japan. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 42(2), 185-203.
- LeFebvre, "Christian Wedding Ceremonies-- 'Nonreligiousness" in Contemporary Japan".
- "Faking it as a priest in Japan". BBC. 2 November 2006. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
- Lebra, T, Sugiyama (1984). Japanese women: constraint and fulfillment. Honolulu University of Hawaii Press, Retrieved 10 January 2009, from NetLibrary